Sunday, 6 January 2019

Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World by Anand Giridharadas





Rich American men, who tend to live longer than the average citizens of any other country, now live 15 years longer than poor American men, who endure only as long as men in Sudan and Pakistan.




There is no denying that today's elite may be among the more socially concerned elites in history.  But it is also, by the cold logic of numbers, among the more predatory in history.  By refusing to risk its way of life, by rejecting the idea that the powerful might have to sacrifice for the common good, it clings to a set of social arrangements that allow it to monopolize progress and then give it symbolic scraps to the forsaken -- many of whom wouldn't need the scraps if the society were working right.




This idea that self-love trickles down to others is an early ancestor of win-win-ism.



Ubers and Airbnbs and Facebooks and Googles of the world are at once radically democratic and dangerously oligarchic.



It is not inevitable that what passes for progress in our age involves the concentration of power into a small number of hands and the issuance of stories about the powerful being fighters for the little guy.



The more genuine criticism is left out and the more sunny, actionable, takeaway-prone ideas are elevated, the shallower the very idea of change becomes.  When a thought leader strips politics and perpetrators from a problem, she often gains access to a bigger platform to influence change-makers -- but she also adds to the vast pile of stories promoted... that tell us that change is easy, is a win-win, and doesn't require sacrifice.